Collocation of androgen receptor gene mutations in prostate cancer.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
Consistent with both the development of the normal prostate gland and prostate tumorigenesis being dependent on testicular androgens, targeting the androgen-signaling axis (i.e., androgen ablation therapy) remains the predominant treatment regime for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Although there is a very good initial response to androgen ablation, these treatments are essentially palliative. Recent evidence suggests that treatment failure may not result from a loss of androgen signaling but, rather, from the acquisition of genetic changes that lead to aberrant activation of the androgen-signaling axis. A consistent finding is that androgen receptor (AR) gene mutations, present in metastatic prostate cancer and in human prostate cancer cell lines as well as in xenograft and other animal models, result in decreased specificity of ligand-binding and inappropriate receptor activation by estrogens, progestins, adrenal androgens, glucocorticoids and/or AR antagonists. Because a significant proportion of missense mutations in the AR gene reported in prostate cancer collocate to the signature sequence and AF-2, two discrete regions of the ligand-binding domain critical for androgen signaling, we recently proposed that collocation of mutations identified in prostate cancer would identify additional regions of the AR important in receptor function. This approach led to the identification of a four-amino acid region at the boundary of the hinge and ligand-binding domains of the receptor that forms half of a potential protein-protein binding site. AR gene mutations have also been identified that collocate to areas in the DNA-binding domain, to the NH(2)-terminal transactivation domain, and to the hinge region in prostate tumors. In nearly every case, missense mutations in the AR gene identified in prostate cancer that collocate to discrete regions of the receptor contribute to altered androgen signaling and provide a potential mechanism to explain the reemergence of tumor growth during the course of hormone ablation therapies.
