Appropriate or inappropriate left ventricular mass in the presence or absence of prognostically adverse left ventricular hypertrophy.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether assessment of appropriateness of left ventricular mass (LVM) adds to the traditional definition of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, relational. METHODS: Echocardiographic LVH and appropriateness of LVM were studied in 562 subjects (231 normotensive controls, aged 35+/-11 years, 142 women; 331 hypertensive patients, aged 47+/-11 years, 135 women) classified on the basis of either the presence or the absence of both LVH (LVM index > or = 51 g/m2.7) and inappropriate LVM (LVM > 128% of the value predicted by an equation including age, sex and stroke work). RESULTS: Body mass index was comparable in hypertensive patients and controls. Hypertensive patients without LVH but with inappropriate LVM (n = 21) had higher relative wall thickness and total peripheral resistance than all other groups, whereas cardiac output was lower (all P < 0.001). Midwall mechanics was normal with appropriate LVM, independently of presence of LVH, whereas it was depressed in inappropriate LVM, either with or without LVH (both P < 0.0001). There was no substantial difference in ejection fraction among controls and hypertensive groups. Stress-corrected midwall shortening was more closely related to deviation of LVM from the value appropriate for stroke work, body size and gender (r = -0.56, P < 0.0001) than to LVM index (r = -0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate LVM is associated with concentric geometry, high peripheral resistance and depressed wall mechanics. The deviation of LVM from the value appropriate for stroke work, body size and sex correlates with measures of myocardial function better than LVM.
