Analysis of publications in three plastic surgery journals for the year 2002.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
The goal of this study was to analyze the publications in the plastic surgery literature for the year 2002. Contents of these articles, authors' information (such as nationality affiliation of the first author), type of institution, presence of grant support, and previous presentation were analyzed. For inclusion in this study, the publications had to be original articles from the three most frequently read general plastic surgery journals: Annals of Plastic Surgery, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. With this approach, 533 articles were included in the study. To give a cross-sectional analysis of the content of all articles, 11 distinct categories were created in which all the articles were subsummarized. The categories were based on anatomical regions and specific plastic surgical areas. A summary is given for each of the categories to provide an overview of the field in which most of the research in plastic surgery was taking place in 2002 and which topics were focused on. The authors found that only 7 percent of all articles had grant support, whereas 36 percent of articles were presented previously during a scientific meeting. Most of the articles came from university-based institutions (68 percent), followed by non-university-based institutions (29 percent) and private practice (3 percent). Regarding nationality affiliation, most of the articles came from the United States (n = 229) and Europe (n = 128); in Asia, Turkey (n = 39) and Japan (n = 36) were the countries with the most published articles.
