The imaging evaluation of a patient who has a clinically suspected stress reaction or fracture should begin with high-resolution radiographs of the area in question. In inconclusive or indeterminate cases, additional imaging should be obtained. CT provides exquisitely fine osseous detail, in multiple planes, often demonstrating the endosteal remodeling or fracture line that is not apparent on conventional radiographs. The sensitivity of nuclear scintigraphy depicts areas of even subtle osseous turnover and stress remodeling. Ultrasonography, used increasingly in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system, can provide a limited evaluation of the superficial osseous structures, providing an imaging alternative, especially in patients who are MRI-incompatible. MRI, however, provides the most comprehensive evaluation of stress injuries, revealing both functional and morphologic information about the bone.
