Head and neck melanoma in the sentinel lymph node era. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in the era of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, head and neck melanoma (HNM) has a poorer outcome than melanomas at other sites (OMS). DESIGN: Prospective database, 1994 to 2004. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with HNM vs those with OMS were analyzed by Fisher test, paired t test, and chi(2) test. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 755 patients with melanoma who had undergone SLN biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between patients with HNM and those with OMS. RESULTS: A total of 17.4% of patients had HNM vs 82.6% with OMS. There was a male HNM preponderance: 68.7% vs 50.3% for females (P < .01). Patients with HNM were older (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [16.6] years vs 53.3 [16.2] years; P < .01). There were fewer cases of superficial spreading melanoma in patients with HNM (29.0% vs 53.7%; P < .01). There were more diagnoses of lentigo maligna in patients with HNM (26.0% vs 1.9%; P < .01). The mean thickness of the primary lesion was 2.32 (1.9) mm vs 2.31 (2.9) mm; P = .49. Fewer patients with HNM had Clark level involvement lower than level IV (13.3% vs 24.0%; P < .01). More SLNs were harvested from patients with HNM (3.72 [3.2] vs 2.89 [2.6]; P < .01), but a lower percentage of positive SLNs was found (9.2% vs 16.0%; P < .05). There was no difference in local, regional, or distant recurrence (5.3%, 6.9%, and 5.3%, respectively, in patients with HNM and 3.4%, 5.5%, and 6.7%, respectively, in patients with OMS). The 2- and 5-year survival rates for patients with HNM were 96.2% and 72.6%, respectively, vs 93.6% and 79.0%, respectively, in patients with OMS (P = .40). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HNM are older males with more SLNs harvested. They do not seem to have poorer outcome than patients with OMS.

publication date

  • November 1, 2007

Research

keywords

  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Melanoma
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 36349007066

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1001/archotol.133.11.1121

PubMed ID

  • 18025316

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 133

issue

  • 11