Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • This Comparative Effectiveness Review (CER) compares the benefits in fracture reduction and the harms from adverse events (AE) among and within the various classes of treatment for low bone density. Our outcomes of interest for measuring benefits are vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and radial fractures. The studies collect vertebral fracture outcomes in one of two ways. In some studies, all participants undergo radiography at pre-determined intervals. Other studies use clinical criteria, i.e. whether a fracture has been diagnosed by a clinician during the time interval. Trials that radiograph all participants will by nature detect more fractures. However the higher detection rate will apply to both treatment and placebo groups. Thus, the relative differences found should be similar that found in studies that use clinical criteria.

authors

  • MacLean, Catherine
  • Alexander, Alicia
  • Carter, Jason
  • Chen, Susan
  • Desai, Sheetal B
  • Grossman, Jennifer
  • Maglione, Margaret
  • McMahon, Maureen
  • Alexander, Alicia
  • McNamara, Melissa
  • Desai, Sheetal B
  • Ranganath, Veena
  • Chen, Susan
  • Carter, Jason
  • Tringale, Carlo
  • Valentine, Di
  • Johnsen, Breanne

publication date

  • December 17, 2007

Research

keywords

  • Bone Density
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Estrogen Replacement Therapy
  • Fractures, Bone
  • Osteoporosis
  • Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 39349086278

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00198

PubMed ID

  • 18087050

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 148

issue

  • 3