Image-guidance for endoscopic sinus surgery. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Image-guided surgery (IGS) is a critical tool. However, its clinical validity remains controversial. A review of indications and a consensus based on literature are presented. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: Traditional indications remain valid. Novel applications have emerged, and the reliability of IGS has been consistently endorsed. Although evidence is based on scattered reports and expert opinions, the use of IGS in approved instances is regarded as the state of the art. CONCLUSIONS: IGS is reliable, and a scientific validation of outcomes would entail unethical strategies. An expanding spectrum of indications is anticipated, although IGS does not replace proper training.

publication date

  • July 1, 2008

Research

keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Paranasal Sinus Diseases
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 47149088467

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816bce76

PubMed ID

  • 18391767

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 118

issue

  • 7