VATS lobectomy is better than open thoracotomy: what is the evidence for short-term outcomes?

Overview

VATS lobectomy is an acceptable alternative to open lobectomy for treating early-stage NSCLC. Although no large randomized control trial has compared these procedures, recent large series and case-control studies provide strong evidence that patients undergoing VATS lobectomy have less pain, fewer perioperative complications, shorter chest-tube duration, and decreased length of stay. Increasing evidence supports improved quality of life up to 1 year, less inflammation, and greater safety profile in high-risk patients. More data are needed to better show an improvement in the economic efficacy, ability to more effectively administer adjuvant therapies, and benefit of robotic assistance in VATS lobectomy.