Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: To characterize the inter- and intraobserver variability of qualitative, non-disk contour degenerative findings of the lumbar spine at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case accrual method used to perform this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was the random selection of 111 interpretable MR examination cases of subjects from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. The subjects were aged 18-87 years (mean, 53 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]). Four independent readers rated the cases according to defined criteria. A subsample of 40 MR examination cases was selected for reevaluation at least 1 month later. The following findings were assessed: spondylolisthesis, disk degeneration, marrow endplate abnormality (Modic changes), posterior anular hyperintense zone (HIZ), and facet arthropathy. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in rating the data was summarized by using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.66) in rating disk degeneration and moderate in rating spondylolisthesis (kappa = 0.55), Modic changes (kappa = 0.59), facet arthropathy (kappa = 0.54), and posterior HIZ (kappa = 0.44). Interobserver agreement in rating the extent of Modic changes was moderate: kappa Values were 0.43 for determining superior anteroposterior extent, 0.47 for determining superior craniocaudal extent, 0.57 for determining inferior anteroposterior extent, and 0.48 for determining inferior craniocaudal extent. Intraobserver agreement was good in rating spondylolisthesis (kappa = 0.66), disk degeneration (kappa = 0.74), Modic changes (kappa = 0.64), facet arthropathy (kappa = 0.69), and posterior HIZ (kappa = 0.67). Intraobserver agreement in rating the extent of Modic changes was moderate, with kappa values of 0.54 for superior anteroposterior, 0.60 for inferior anteroposterior, 0.50 for superior craniocaudal, and 0.60 for inferior craniocaudal extent determinations. CONCLUSION: The interpretation of general lumbar spine MR characteristics has sufficient reliability to warrant the further evaluation of these features as potential prognostic indicators.

authors

  • Carrino, John
  • Lurie, Jon D
  • Tosteson, Anna N A
  • Tosteson, Tor D
  • Carragee, Eugene J
  • Kaiser, Jay
  • Grove, Margaret R
  • Blood, Emily
  • Pearson, Loretta H
  • Weinstein, James N
  • Herzog, Richard

publication date

  • October 27, 2008

Research

keywords

  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Spinal Diseases

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC2657480

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 58149331043

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1148/radiol.2493071999

PubMed ID

  • 18955509

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 250

issue

  • 1