Prognostic impact of RT-PCR-based detection of peritoneal micrometastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Positive peritoneal fluid cytology predicts poor outcome in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been proposed as a more sensitive means of detection of peritoneal micrometastases than conventional cytology. The clinical significance of RT-PCR positivity in the absence of other evidence of peritoneal disease is unknown. The purpose of the current study was to determine the outcome RT-PCR positive/cytology-negative patients who underwent potentially curative resection. METHODS: Peritoneal washings were collected prospectively from 115 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy at a single institution. Specimens were analyzed by a cytopathologist and by RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). RESULTS: Of the 115 patients, 62 (54%) underwent R0 resection. Eleven of the 62 patients (18%) had peritoneal washings that were negative by conventional cytology but positive for CEA by RT-PCR. Those 11 patients experienced early peritoneal and overall disease recurrence versus those who were RT-PCR negative (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively) independent of nodal status. CONCLUSIONS: RT-PCR for CEA is a sensitive and specific method for the detection of clinically significant peritoneal micrometastases from pancreatic cancer and it might identify a subgroup of patients with otherwise negative findings at staging laparoscopy who might respond better to treatment other than primary surgical resection.

publication date

  • September 18, 2009

Research

keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC3275341

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 71549119822

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1245/s10434-009-0683-2

PubMed ID

  • 19763694

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 16

issue

  • 12