Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation.

Overview

We report the results of postoperative physiologic and functional evaluation of 153 patients with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA). Ninety-nine patients had anal manipulation for either mucosal proctectomy, transanal placement pursestring suture with stapled IPAA, or handsewn IPAA (manipulation). Fifty-four patients had stapled IPAA with anal pursestrings placed transabdominally without mucosectomy (no manipulation). Patients with transabdominal anal pursestring placement and stapled IPAA without mucosectomy had a higher mean maximum anal resting pressure than patients who had endoanal manipulation. This correlates with improved continence and a reduced need to wear a pad. Avoidance of anal manipulation preserves anal canal resting tone and improves the functional result after IPAA.