Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to define the frequency of stent gaps by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and their relation to in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent fracture (SF), and overlap failure (OF). BACKGROUND: SF defined by catheter angiography or intravascular ultrasound has been implicated in ISR. METHODS: A total of 292 consecutive patients, with 613 stents, who underwent CTA were evaluated for stent gaps associated with decreased Hounsfield units. Correlations with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) were available in 143 patients with 384 stents. RESULTS: Stent gaps were noted in 16.9% by CTA and 1.0% by CCA. ISR by CCA was noted in 46.1% of the stent gaps (p < 0.001) as determined by CCA, and stent gaps by CTA accounted for 27.8% of the total ISR (p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, stent diameter > or =3 mm was the only CCA characteristic significantly associated with stent gaps (p = 0.002), but was not a significant predictor by multivariate analysis. Bifurcation stents, underlying calcification, stent type, location, post-dilation, and overlapping stents were not observed to be predisposing factors. Excessive tortuosity and lack of conformability were not associated with stent gaps; however, their frequency was insufficient to permit meaningful analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Stent gap by CTA: 1) is associated with 28% of ISR, and ISR is found in 46% of stent gaps; 2) is associated with > or =3-mm stents by univariate (p = 0.002) but not by multivariate analysis; 3) is infrequently noted on catheter angiography; and 4) most likely represents SF in the setting of a single stent, and may represent SF or OF in overlapping stents.

publication date

  • November 17, 2009

Research

keywords

  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Restenosis
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular
  • Stents
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 70350708668

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.045

PubMed ID

  • 19909876

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 54

issue

  • 21