Response to second-line therapy defines the potential for cure in patients with recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are not cured by initial therapy sometimes experience disease-free survival after autologous stem cell transplantation. Chemotherapy responsiveness before transplantation is a major predictor of outcome. Patients not responding to second-line regimens may receive third-line therapy in the hopes of achieving response, but outcome data are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL at Weill Cornell Medical Center for whom data on responses to second-line chemotherapy were available. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who underwent second-line chemotherapy between 1996 and 2007 were identified. Of these patients, 27 (36%) did not respond. The median overall survival of nonresponding patients was 4 months, and only 1 patient (4%) survived for 1 year. The choice of third-line aggressive chemotherapy instead of less intensive approaches did not confer a survival benefit. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that patients with recurrent DLBCL not responding to second-line chemotherapy demonstrate dismal outcomes. Trials of novel regimens should be prioritized as management strategies for these patients. Our data provide an important benchmark in the evaluation of the potential clinical value of such approaches.

publication date

  • June 1, 2010

Research

keywords

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Salvage Therapy

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 77955872819

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3816/CLML.2010.n.030

PubMed ID

  • 20511164

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 10

issue

  • 3