Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: role of patient-level factors. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To assess racial differences in attitudes and knowledge about sterilization. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Questionnaires were mailed to participants' home addresses. PATIENT(S): One hundred ninety-three women, aged 18-45, who had undergone tubal sterilization. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Attitudes and knowledge about tubal sterilization and awareness of contraceptive alternatives. RESULT(S): We received 193 completed surveys (64% response rate). African American (AA) woman were more likely to have a family member who had undergone tubal sterilization, to report that their mothers influenced their sterilization decisions, and to report that prior unintended pregnancy and desire to avoid insertion of a foreign object were very important factors in their decision to choose sterilization over other methods. Compared with white women, AA women more often thought that sterilization reversal could easily restore fertility (62% vs. 36%); that a woman's sterilization would reverse itself after 5 years (60% vs. 23%); and that a man cannot ejaculate after vasectomy (38% vs. 13%). Fewer AA women had ever heard of intrauterine contraception (90% vs. 98%). Racial differences in knowledge remained statistically significant after adjusting for socioeconomic confounders. CONCLUSION(S): Misinformation about sterilization and limited awareness of contraceptive alternatives among AA women may contribute to racial disparities in tubal sterilization rates.

publication date

  • June 25, 2010

Research

keywords

  • African Americans
  • Attitude to Health
  • Black or African American
  • European Continental Ancestry Group
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Sterilization, Tubal
  • White People
  • Whites

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC2970690

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 78650416170

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.031

PubMed ID

  • 20579640

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 95

issue

  • 1