Accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy in determining relative position and orientation of total knee replacement components. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • The accuracy of estimating the relative pose between knee replacement components, in terms of clinical motion, is important in the study of knee joint kinematics. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the single-plane fluoroscopy method in calculating the relative pose between the femoral component and the tibial component, along knee motion axes, while the components were in motion relative to one another. The kinematics of total knee replacement components were determined in vitro using two simultaneous methods: single-plane fluoroscopic shape matching and an optoelectronic motion tracking system. The largest mean differences in relative pose between the two methods for any testing condition were 2.1°, 0.3°, and 1.1° in extension, abduction, and internal rotation respectively, and 1.3, 0.9, and 1.9 mm in anterior, distal, and lateral translations, respectively. For the optimized position of the components during dynamic trials, the limits of agreement, between which 95% of differences can be expected to fall, were -2.9 to 4.5° in flexion, -0.9 to 1.5° in abduction, -2.4 to 2.1° in external rotation, -2.0 to 3.9 mm in anterior-posterior translation, -2.2 to 0.4mm in distal-proximal translation and -7.2 to 8.6mm in medial-lateral translation. These mean accuracy values and limits of agreement can be used to determine whether the shape-matching approach using single-plane fluoroscopic images is sufficiently accurate for an intended motion tracking application.

publication date

  • November 18, 2010

Research

keywords

  • Algorithms
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Knee Joint
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 79951722063

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.033

PubMed ID

  • 21092967

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 44

issue

  • 4