Hospital do-not-resuscitate orders: why they have failed and how to fix them. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders have been in use in hospitals nationwide for over 20 years. Nonetheless, as currently implemented, they fail to adequately fulfill their two intended purposes--to support patient autonomy and to prevent non-beneficial interventions. These failures lead to serious consequences. Patients are deprived of the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding resuscitation, and CPR is performed on patients who would have wanted it withheld or are harmed by the procedure. This article highlights the persistent problems with today's use of inpatient DNR orders, i.e., DNR discussions do not occur frequently enough and occur too late in the course of patients' illnesses to allow their participation in resuscitation decisions. Furthermore, many physicians fail to provide adequate information to allow patients or surrogates to make informed decisions and inappropriately extrapolate DNR orders to limit other treatments. Because these failings are primarily due to systemic factors that result in deficient physician behaviors, we propose strategies to target these factors including changing the hospital culture, reforming hospital policies on DNR discussions, mandating provider communication skills training, and using financial incentives. These strategies could help overcome existing barriers to proper DNR discussions and align the use of DNR orders closer to their intended purposes of supporting patient self-determination and avoiding non-beneficial interventions at the end of life.

publication date

  • February 1, 2011

Research

keywords

  • Informed Consent
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Resuscitation Orders
  • Terminal Care

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC3138592

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 80051551078

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1007/s11606-011-1632-x

PubMed ID

  • 21286839

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 26

issue

  • 7