Imaging: strategies, controversies, and opportunities. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • At a Clinical and Translational Cancer Research Think Tank meeting sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research in 2010, one of the breakout groups focused on new technologies and imaging. The discussions emphasized new opportunities in translational imaging and its role in the future, rather than established techniques that are currently in clinical practice. New imaging methods under development are changing the approach of imaging science from a focus on the anatomic description of disease to a focus on the molecular basis of disease. Broadly referred to as molecular imaging, these new strategies directly embrace the incorporation of cell and molecular biology concepts and techniques into image generation and can involve the introduction of genes into cells with the explicit intent to image the end products of gene expression with external imaging devices. These new methods hold the promise of providing clinicians with (i) robust linkages between cell and animal models and clinical trials, (ii) in vivo biomarkers that can be measured repeatedly and sequentially over time to observe dynamic disease processes and responses to treatment, and (iii) tools for preselection and patient population enrichment in phase II and III trials to improve outcomes and better direct treatment. These strategies provide real-time pharmacodynamic parameters and can be powerful tools to monitor therapeutic effects in a spatially and tissue-specific manner, which may reduce cost during drug development, because pharmacodynamic studies in animals can inform clinical trials and accelerate the translation process. The Imaging Response Assessment Team (IRAT) program serves as an example of how imaging techniques can be incorporated into clinical trials. IRATs work to advance the role of imaging in assessment of response to therapy and to increase the application of quantitative anatomic, functional, and molecular imaging endpoints in clinical trials, and imaging strategies that will lead to individualized patient care.

publication date

  • February 1, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Neoplasms

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84856534743

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2020

PubMed ID

  • 22298896

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 18

issue

  • 3