Comparison of glomerular filtration rate determined by use of single-slice dynamic computed tomography and scintigraphy in cats. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To compare estimation of glomerular filtration rate determined via conventional methods (ie, scintigraphy and plasma clearance of technetium Tc 99m pentetate) and dynamic single-slice computed tomography (CT). ANIMALS: 8 healthy adult cats. PROCEDURES: Scintigraphy, plasma clearance testing, and dynamic CT were performed on each cat on the same day; order of examinations was randomized. Separate observers performed GFR calculations for scintigraphy, plasma clearance testing, or dynamic CT. Methods were compared via Bland-Altman plots and considered interchangeable and acceptable when the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference between methods ± 1.96 SD of the differences) were ≤ 0.7 mL/min/kg. RESULTS: Global GFR differed < 0.7 mL/min/kg in 5 of 8 cats when comparing plasma clearance testing and dynamic CT; the limits of agreement were 1.4 and -1.7 mL/min/kg. The mean ± SD difference was -0.2 ± 0.8 mL/min/kg, and the maximum difference was 1.6 mL/min/kg. The mean ± SD difference (absolute value) for percentage filtration by individual kidneys was 2.4 ± 10.5% when comparing scintigraphy and dynamic CT; the maximum difference was 20%, and the limits of agreement were 18% and 23% (absolute value). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: GFR estimation via dynamic CT exceeded the definition for acceptable clinical use, compared with results for conventional methods, which was likely attributable to sample size and preventable technical complications. Because 5 of 8 cats had comparable values between methods, further investigation of dynamic CT in a larger sample population with a wide range of GFR values should be performed.

publication date

  • April 1, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Cats
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84859141743

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2460/ajvr.73.4.463

PubMed ID

  • 22452491

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 73

issue

  • 4