Racial/ethnic differences in emergency care for joint dislocation in 53 US EDs. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate racial/ethnic differences in emergency care for patients with joint dislocation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the dislocation component of the National Emergency Department Safety Study. Using a principal diagnosis of dislocation, we identified emergency department (ED) visits for joint dislocations in 53 urban EDs across 19 US states between 2003 and 2005. Quality of care was evaluated based on 9 guideline-concordant care measures. RESULTS: Of the 1945 patients included in this analysis, 1124 (58%) were white; 561 (29%), black, and 260 (13%), Hispanic. One-third of the 53 EDs cared for 51% of minority patients. After multivariable adjustment, black patients were less likely to receive any analgesic treatment (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.90) or opioid treatment (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.997), waited longer to receive analgesia (mean difference in time to analgesic treatment, 32 minutes; 95% CI, 16-52 minutes), and were less likely to receive reassessments of pain (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70) compared with white patients. There were no ethnic disparities in most of the care measures between Hispanic and white patients. There were no disparities in initial pain assessment, pre- and postprocedural neurovascular assessment, procedural monitoring, or success of joint reduction across the racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients presenting to the ED with joint dislocations received lower quality of care in some, but not all, areas compared with white patients. Future interventions should target these areas to eliminate racial disparities in dislocation care.

publication date

  • July 15, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Healthcare Disparities
  • Joint Dislocations

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84869161468

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.023

PubMed ID

  • 22795991

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 30

issue

  • 9