Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To report our unique approach for individualizing robotic prostate cancer surgery by risk stratification and sub classification of the periprostatic space into 4 distinct compartments, and thus performing 4 precise different grades of nerve sparing based on neurosurgical principles and to present updated potency and continence outcomes data of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using our risk-stratified approach based on layers of periprostatic fascial dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: (1) Between January 2005 and December 2010, 2,536 men underwent RALP by a single surgeon at our institution. (2) Included patients were those with ≥ 1-year follow-up and were preoperatively continent and potent, defined as having a SHIM questionnaire score of >21; thus, the final number of patient in the study cohort was 1,335. (3) Postoperative potency was defined as the ability to have successful intercourse (score of ≥ 4 on question 2 of the SHIM); continence was defined as the use of no pads per 24 h. RESULTS: (1) The potency and continence for NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 90.6, 76.2, 60.5, and 57.1 % (P < 0.001) and 98, 93.2, 90.1, and 88.9 % (P < 0.001), respectively. (2) The overall PSM rates for patients with NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 10.5, 7, 5.8, and 4.8 %, respectively (P = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: The study found a correlation between risk-stratified grades of NS technique and continence and potency. Patients with lesser grades of NS had higher rates of potency and continence.

publication date

  • January 26, 2013

Research

keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Organ Sparing Treatments
  • Prostate
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Robotics

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84878215545

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1007/s00345-012-1018-7

PubMed ID

  • 23354288

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 31

issue

  • 3