Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: We explored the impact of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy on the prediction of final surgical pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 consecutive men undergoing radical prostatectomy at UCLA after fusion biopsy were included in this prospective, institutional review board approved pilot study. Using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion, tissue was obtained from a 12-point systematic grid (mapping biopsy) and from regions of interest detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (targeted biopsy). A single radiologist read all magnetic resonance imaging, and a single pathologist independently rereviewed all biopsy and whole mount pathology, blinded to prior interpretation and matched specimen. Gleason score concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy was the primary end point. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 62 years and median prostate specific antigen was 6.2 ng/ml. Final Gleason score at prostatectomy was 6 (13%), 7 (70%) and 8-9 (17%). A tertiary pattern was detected in 17 (31%) men. Of 45 high suspicion (image grade 4-5) magnetic resonance imaging targets 32 (71%) contained prostate cancer. The per core cancer detection rate was 20% by systematic mapping biopsy and 42% by targeted biopsy. The highest Gleason pattern at prostatectomy was detected by systematic mapping biopsy in 54%, targeted biopsy in 54% and a combination in 81% of cases. Overall 17% of cases were upgraded from fusion biopsy to final pathology and 1 (2%) was downgraded. The combination of targeted biopsy and systematic mapping biopsy was needed to obtain the best predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy allowed for the prediction of final prostate pathology with greater accuracy than that reported previously using conventional methods (81% vs 40% to 65%). If confirmed, these results will have important clinical implications.

publication date

  • May 1, 2014

Research

keywords

  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Endosonography
  • Image-Guided Biopsy
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prostatic Neoplasms

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4201866

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84910062647

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094

PubMed ID

  • 24793118

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 192

issue

  • 5