Adolescents' and young adults' perspectives on their emergency care.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the perspectives of adolescents and young adults seen in the emergency department (ED) on the optimal age for transition from a pediatric ED (PED) to an adult ED (AED) as well as the appropriateness of their assigned ED site. Secondary aims were to determine ED physicians' understanding and assessment of their psychosocial needs, to determine whether subjects had a primary care provider (PCP), as well as to identify resources they felt would improve their ED experience. METHODS: This study used in-person structured interviews on a convenience sample of ED patients aged 15 to 25 years. Data were analyzed with the SPSS for Windows (v15.0) using t tests and uncertainty coefficients. RESULTS: We interviewed 200 subjects; the mean age was 20.5 (SD, 3) years, 65% were female, and 54% were seen in the PED. The subjects reported a mean age of 18.5 years as optimal for transition to an AED (mode, 18; second peak, 21); only 5% chose an age older than 21 years. The AED subjects more likely felt that their site of care was appropriate (Likert scale, 1-3; 2.5 vs 2.2, P < 0.05). HEADSS (Home, Education/Employment, Activity, Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide) topics were rarely addressed in both ED sites. The PED subjects more often identified a PCP (87% vs 68%); there was no difference in notifying their PCP (27% vs 19%). The PED subjects more often desired magazines (83% vs 70%) and entertainment videos (61% vs 34%). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and young adults identify the age of 18 years as optimal for transition from a PED to an AED setting. Instituting a standardized HEADSS assessment protocol and offering age-appropriate resources may enhance the emergency experience for this population.
