Comparison of 2-limb versus 3-limb electrodiagnostic studies in the evaluation of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • INTRODUCTION: European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society electrodiagnostic (EDx) criteria for the definite diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) require the presence of demyelinating findings (DF) in at least 2 nerves. Data are lacking, however, regarding the optimal number of nerves to test. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed EDx data from 53 patients with CIDP and compared the number of DF found on 2- and 3-limb testing. RESULTS: A median of 3 (range 2-5) DF were found on 2-limb testing compared with 5 (range 4-7) DF when 3 limbs were evaluated. Two-limb EDx studies were sufficient to diagnose definite CIDP in 92.3% of typical, 84.2% of asymmetric, and 66.7% of distal phenotypes. Testing a third limb increased diagnostic certainty in 11 patients (20.8%) to definite CIDP. CONCLUSIONS: Three-limb testing may increase diagnostic sensitivity of definite CIDP, especially in patients with atypical phenotypes. Larger prospective studies are needed to better assess the benefit of performing 3-limb EDx studies.

publication date

  • February 17, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Electrodiagnosis
  • Extremities
  • Neural Conduction
  • Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84925442600

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/mus.24424

PubMed ID

  • 25131219

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 51

issue

  • 4