Using research evidence to reframe the policy debate around mental illness and guns: process and recommendations. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Recent mass shootings have prompted a national dialogue around mental illness and gun policy. To advance an evidence-informed policy agenda on this controversial issue, we formed a consortium of national gun violence prevention and mental health experts. The consortium agreed on a guiding principle for future policy recommendations: restricting firearm access on the basis of certain dangerous behaviors is supported by the evidence; restricting access on the basis of mental illness diagnoses is not. We describe the group's process and recommendations.

authors

  • McGinty, Beth
  • Frattaroli, Shannon
  • Appelbaum, Paul S
  • Bonnie, Richard J
  • Grilley, Anna
  • Horwitz, Joshua
  • Swanson, Jeffrey W
  • Webster, Daniel W

publication date

  • September 11, 2014

Research

keywords

  • Firearms
  • Mental Disorders
  • Policy Making

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4202989

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84907828246

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302171

PubMed ID

  • 25211757

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 104

issue

  • 11