Comparing Platforms for Messenger RNA Expression Profiling of Archival Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens represent a readily available but largely untapped resource for gene expression profiling-based biomarker discovery. Several technologies have been proposed to cope with the bias from RNA cross-linking and degradation associated with archival specimens to generate data comparable with RNA from fresh-frozen materials. Direct comparison studies of these RNA expression platforms remain rare. We compared two commercially available platforms for RNA expression profiling of archival FFPE specimens from clinical studies of prostate and ovarian cancer: the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0ST Array following whole-transcriptome amplification using the NuGen WT-Ovation FFPE System V2, and the NanoString nCounter without amplification. For each assay, we profiled 7 prostate and 11 ovarian cancer specimens, with a block age of 4 to 21 years. Both platforms produced gene expression profiles with high sensitivity and reproducibility through technical repeats from FFPE materials. Sensitivity and reproducibility remained high across block age within each cohort. A strong concordance was shown for the transcript expression values for genes detected by both platforms. We showed the biological validity of specific gene signatures generated by both platforms for both cohorts. Our study supports the feasibility of gene expression profiling and large-scale signature validation on archival prostate and ovarian tumor specimens using commercial platforms. These approaches have the potential to aid precision medicine with biomarker discovery and validation.

publication date

  • April 30, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Formaldehyde
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Paraffin Embedding
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • RNA, Messenger
  • Tissue Fixation

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4483460

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84931332029

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.02.002

PubMed ID

  • 25937617

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 17

issue

  • 4