Glenoid notch MRI findings do not predict normal variants of the anterior and superior labrum. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • AIM: To determine (1) the relationship of a glenoid notch to the presence of a normal labral variant in the anterior-superior glenoid labrum; (2) the inter- and intra-observer reliability of recognising a glenoid notch; and (3) whether magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is more reliable than non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in visualising a glenoid notch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1995 through 2010, 104 patients underwent MRI or MRA before diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy by the senior author. Five blinded musculoskeletal radiologists independently read the images twice to evaluate for the presence or absence of a glenoid notch. Fifty-nine (57%) patients had normal anterior-superior labral variants. The authors calculated the relationship of the readings to the arthroscopically determined presence or absence of a normal labral variant and the reading's diagnostic performance and rater reliability. RESULTS: On average, 38% (range 9-65%) of the glenoid scans were read as notched. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the notch relative to the presence of a normal variant were 43.1%, 71.2%, 70.2%, and 48% versus 44.3%, 77.5%, 79.4%, and 56.1% for MRI and MRA, respectively. The overall average intra-observer κ-values were 0.438 (range 0.203-0.555) and 0.346 (range -0.102 to 0.570) for MRI and MRA, respectively. The average interobserver intra-class correlation coefficient reliability values were 0.730 (range 0.693-0.760) and 0.614 (range 0.566-0.662) for MRI and MRA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A notched glenoid on MRI lacks sufficient diagnostic performance and rater reliability for the clinical detection and prediction of normal anterior-superior labral variants.

publication date

  • June 3, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Arthrography
  • Contrast Media
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Shoulder Joint

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84936985741

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.016

PubMed ID

  • 26050070

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 70

issue

  • 8