Should Antihypertensive Treatment Recommendations Differ in Patients With and Without Coronary Heart Disease? (from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]). Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Thiazide-type diuretics have been recommended for initial treatment of hypertension in most patients, but should this recommendation differ for patients with and without coronary heart disease (CHD)? The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was a randomized, double-blind hypertension treatment trial in 42,418 participants with high risk of combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) (25% with preexisting CHD). This post hoc analysis compares long-term major clinical outcomes in those assigned amlodipine (n = 9048) or lisinopril (n = 9,054) with those assigned chlorthalidone (n = 15,255), stratified by CHD status. After 4 to 8 years, randomized treatment was discontinued. Total follow-up (active treatment + passive surveillance using national databases for deaths and hospitalizations) was 8 to 13 years. For most CVD outcomes, end-stage renal disease, and total mortality, there were no differences across randomized treatment arms regardless of baseline CHD status. In-trial rates of CVD were significantly higher for lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone, and rates of heart failure were significantly higher for amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone in those with and without CHD (overall hazard ratios [HRs] 1.10, p <0.001, and 1.38, p <0.001, respectively). During extended follow-up, significant outcomes according to CHD status interactions (p = 0.012) were noted in amlodipine versus chlorthalidone comparison for CVD and CHD mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.04, and 0.84, p = 0.04, respectively) in those with CHD at baseline (HR 1.06, p = 0.15, and 1.08, p = 0.17) and in those without. The results of the overall increased stroke mortality in lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.2; p = 0.03) and hospitalized heart failure in amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.12; p = 0.01) during extended follow-up did not differ by baseline CHD status. In conclusion, these results provide no reason to alter our previous recommendation to include a properly dosed diuretic (such as chlorthalidone 12.5 to 25 mg/day) in the initial antihypertensive regimen for most hypertensive patients.

authors

  • Alderman, Michael Harris
  • Davis, Barry R
  • Piller, Linda B
  • Ford, Charles E
  • Baraniuk, M Sarah
  • Pressel, Sara L
  • Assadi, Mahshid A
  • Einhorn, Paula T
  • Haywood, L Julian
  • Ilamathi, Ekambaram
  • Oparil, Suzanne
  • Retta, Tamrat M

publication date

  • October 19, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Dyslipidemias
  • Hypertension
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4690772

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84959212185

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.012

PubMed ID

  • 26589819

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 117

issue

  • 1