Comparative prognostic relevance of breast intra-tumoral microvessel density evaluated by CD105 and CD146: A pilot study of 42 cases. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • UNLABELLED: Angiogenesis is a key process for metastatic progression. While it has been established that the evaluation of breast tumoral microvessel density by CD105 marker is a potential prognostic parameter, its evaluation by CD146 marker has been poorly studied. AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of intra-tumoral microvessel density assayed by CD105 and CD146 in early breast cancer patients. METHODS: 42 women with breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma (I and II-stages) were retrospectively reviewed. Intra-tumoral microvessel density was immunohistochemically examined using antibodies anti-CD105 and CD146 in paraffin-embedded tissues, and their association with classical prognostic-markers, metastatic recurrence, metastasis-free survival and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: High microvessel density assessed by CD146 was significantly associated with a higher risk of developing metastasis (p=0.0310) and a shorter metastasis-free survival (p=0.0197). In contrast, when we used the CD105-antibody, we did not find any significant association. Finally, CD146 showed to be an independent predictive indicator for metastasis-free survival (p=0.0055). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the intra-tumoral microvessel density evaluated by CD146 may be a more suitable predictor of metastatic development than that evaluated by CD105 in early breast cancer.

authors

  • Martinez, Leandro
  • Labovsky, Vivian
  • Calcagno, María de Luján
  • Davies, Kevin Mauro
  • Rivello, Hernán Garcia
  • Wernicke, Alejandra
  • Calvo, Juan Carlos
  • Chasseing, Norma Alejandra

publication date

  • February 2, 2016

Research

keywords

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
  • Endoglin

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84957895157

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.prp.2016.02.009

PubMed ID

  • 26872535

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 212

issue

  • 4