Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Supply Chain and Its Implications for FDA Policy Initiatives. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • In response to concerning increases in antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has decided to increase veterinary oversight requirements for antimicrobials and restrict their use in growth promotion. Given the high stakes of this policy for the food supply, economy, and human and veterinary health, it is important to rigorously assess the effects of this policy. We have undertaken a detailed analysis of data provided by the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). We examined the trends in both AMR proportion and MIC between 2004 and 2012 at slaughter and retail stages. We investigated the makeup of variation in these data and estimated the sample and effect size requirements necessary to distinguish an effect of the policy change. Finally, we applied our approach to take a detailed look at the 2005 withdrawal of approval for the fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin in poultry water. Slaughter and retail showed similar trends. Both AMR proportion and MIC were valuable in assessing AMR, capturing different information. Most variation was within years, not between years, and accounting for geographic location explained little additional variation. At current rates of data collection, a 1-fold change in MIC should be detectable in 5 years and a 6% decrease in percent resistance could be detected in 6 years following establishment of a new resistance rate. Analysis of the enrofloxacin policy change showed the complexities of the AMR policy with no statistically significant change in resistance of both Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli to ciprofloxacin, another second-generation fluoroquinolone.

publication date

  • August 22, 2016

Research

keywords

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
  • Food Microbiology
  • Meat
  • Poultry

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4997833

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84983252131

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1128/AAC.00688-16

PubMed ID

  • 27324772

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 60

issue

  • 9