The presence of carcinoma in situ at radical cystectomy increases the risk of urothelial recurrence: Implications for follow-up schemes. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the incidence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) due to bladder cancer and to assess its effect on recurrence and survival rates. METHODS: The study focused on 1,128 consecutive nonmetastatic patients with bladder cancer treated with RC at a single tertiary care referral center from 1994 to 2014. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality-free rates in the overall population and in pT0-pT2 and pT3-pT4 patients after stratifying according to the presence of CIS. Multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses tested the effect of the presence of CIS on survival outcomes. MVA competing risk analyses were performed to assess the effect of CIS on urothelial recurrence. RESULTS: The presence of CIS was reported in 277 (24.6%) patients. During a median follow-up of 6 years, 355 recurrences, 377 CSM, and 468 overall mortality were reported. At MVA Cox regression analyses, the presence of concomitant CIS was not associated with any survival effect when the overall population was considered (all P≥0.3). At MVA Cox regression analyses, there was no effect of CIS on survival outcomes in pT3-pT4 patients (all P>0.2); on the contrary, the presence of CIS was associated with worse CSM in pT0-pT2 patients only (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82; CI: 1.01-3.29; P = 0.04). At MVA competing risk analyses predicting urothelial recurrence only, the presence of CIS was associated to an increased risk of urothelial recurrence in pT0-pT2 patients (HR = 2.99; CI: 1.05-8.53; P = 0.04), pT3-pT4 patients (HR = 10.29; CI: 1.40-75.75; P = 0.02), and in the overall population (HR = 4.47; CI: 1.81-11.07; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: An increased risk of developing urothelial recurrence only was recorded in patients diagnosed with CIS at RC. Physicians should consider this aspect ensuring a more severe follow-up schemes in patients who harbored this pathological feature.

authors

  • Moschini, Marco
  • Shariat, Shahrokh
  • Abufaraj, Mohammad
  • Soria, Francesco
  • Klatte, Tobias
  • Croce, Giovanni La
  • Mattei, Agostino
  • Damiano, Rocco
  • Salonia, Andrea
  • Montorsi, Francesco
  • Briganti, Alberto
  • Colombo, Renzo
  • Gallina, Andrea

publication date

  • December 5, 2016

Research

keywords

  • Carcinoma in Situ
  • Cystectomy
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85007453150

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.003

PubMed ID

  • 27932269

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 35

issue

  • 4