Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and harm in Emergency Medical Services. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: (AE) METHODS: The study was conducted between March and December 2015. A literature review identified 57 potential triggers, which were grouped together by experts using an affinity process. Triggers for other areas of potential AE/harm were additionally considered for inclusion. An interim TT consisting of nine triggers underwent five iterative rounds of derivation tests of 20 random patient care records (n=100) in two emergency medical services. A final eight-item trigger list underwent a large sample (n=9836) assessment of test characteristics. RESULTS: The final eight-item TT consisted of triggers divided amongst four categories: Clinical, Medication, Procedural and Return-Call. The TT demonstrated an AE identification rate of 41.5% (sensitivity 79.8% (95% CI, 69.9% to 87.6%); specificity 58.5% (95% CI, 52% to 64.8%)). When identifying potential risk for harm, the TT demonstrated a harm identification rate of 19.3% (sensitivity 97.1% (95% CI, 84.7% to 99.9%); specificity 53.5% (95% CI, 47.7% to 59.3%)). DISCUSSION: The Emergency Medical Services Trigger Tool (EMSTT) may be used as a sampling strategy similar to the Global Trigger Tool, to identify and measure AE and harm over time, and monitor the success of improvement initiatives within the Emergency Medical Services setting.

publication date

  • February 2, 2017

Research

keywords

  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Forecasting
  • Medical Errors
  • Patient Safety
  • Risk Assessment

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85013472882

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1136/emermed-2016-205746

PubMed ID

  • 28153866

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 34

issue

  • 6