Endometrial cancer surveillance adherence reduces utilization and subsequent costs. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVES: In June 2011, the SGO recommended that physical exam and symptoms be the primary surveillance methods in patients with endometrial cancer. We sought to evaluate adherence to these guidelines by comparing the use of CT scans, paps and serum CA125 ordered for endometrial cancer surveillance before and after publication of these guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients undergoing surveillance for endometrial cancer at a single institution between June 2009 and June 2013. We assessed the number of patients without symptoms or abnormal physical exam findings who underwent surveillance CT scans, paps and/or CA125 during the 2years pre- and 2years post-SGO guidelines. RESULTS: 92 patients (n=48 pre-6/2011, n=44 post-6/2011) were identified. Mean patient age was 58years. No significant difference in age, ethnicity, body mass index, or disease grade or stage was noted. There was a significant decline in surveillance CT scans (n=13, 27% vs. n=4, 9%, p=0.03), CA125 (n=14, 29% vs. 5, 11%, p=0.035) and paps (n=34, 71% vs. n=8 vs. 18%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in disease status at the last follow-up. Institutional cost of surveillance also declined ($14,102.46 2years pre-guidelines, $3,054.99 2years post-guidelines). CONCLUSIONS: In a single urban academic public hospital, after only 2years, clinical adherence to the 2011 SGO endometrial cancer surveillance guidelines resulted in a significant decline in the use of CT scans, CA125 and paps. This reduction does not appear to affect patient outcomes and led to an appreciable decrease in surveillance costs.

publication date

  • July 19, 2017

Research

keywords

  • CA-125 Antigen
  • Endometrial Neoplasms
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Papanicolaou Test
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Watchful Waiting

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85024852812

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.024

PubMed ID

  • 28734496

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 146

issue

  • 3