Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice. METHODS: We used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review. RESULTS: Across all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Due to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.

authors

  • Yoon, Jang W
  • Chen, Robert
  • Kim, Esther J
  • Akinduro, Oluwaseun O
  • Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
  • Han, Phillip K
  • Si, Phong
  • Freeman, William D
  • Diaz, Roberto J
  • Komotar, Ricardo J
  • Pirris, Stephen M
  • Brown, Benjamin L
  • Bydon, Mohamad
  • Wang, Michael Y
  • Wharen, Robert E
  • Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo

publication date

  • April 30, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted
  • Wearable Electronic Devices

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85046160264

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/rcs.1914

PubMed ID

  • 29708640

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 14

issue

  • 4