Pulmonary Cryoablation Zones: More Aggressive Ablation Is Warranted In Vivo. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the effective cryoablation zone when treating pulmonary tumors in vivo and to create pulmonary-specific ablation maps to guide clinical procedure planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ablation volume was measured retrospectively in human patients after pulmonary tumor cryoablation with a triple-freeze protocol. Single-probe ablations were performed with 17-, 14-, and 13-gauge cryoprobes; multiple-probe ablations were performed with two or three 17-gauge probes. Statistical comparisons of ablation volumes to manufacturer reference values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Comparisons of ablation sizes by the number of probes were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Mean volume of in vivo lung ablation with a single 17-gauge cryoprobe measured 3.0 cm3, which is a statistically significant difference compared with the in vitro -20°C isotherm volume of 22.6 cm3 (p < 0.01). Mean ablation volume of larger 13- and 14-gauge cryoprobes were 4.3 and 1.8 cm3, respectively, both of which are smaller than the in vitro -20°C isotherm volume. Mean cryoablation zone was not significantly affected by distance to the pleura (p = 0.54) or distance to a vessel (p = 0.55). Ablation volume was significantly increased (p < 0.01) with the use of multiple cryoprobes, at a rate of a 10.8-cm3 increase per additional probe. The increased ablation zone size was more attributable to increased short-axis width (9.6-mm increase per probe) compared with long-axis length (5.6-mm increase per probe). CONCLUSION: The in vivo effective pulmonary cryoablation zone is significantly smaller than the manufacturer-published in vitro isotherm. Larger ablation margins in lung are best achieved by using multiple cryoprobes.

publication date

  • November 1, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Cryosurgery
  • Lung Neoplasms

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85058871774

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2214/AJR.18.19527

PubMed ID

  • 30383408

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 212

issue

  • 1