The surviving sepsis controversy: a call to action for hospital medicine. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • INTRODUCTION: There remains significant controversy behind the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, as evidenced by the Infectious Diseases Society of America refusing to endorse the latest iteration put forth by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. An important stakeholder in this debate has not yet been adequately represented: hospitalists. Areas covered: In this perspective piece, we review the key points in this controversy; specifically, the current guidelines for the identification and management of sepsis. Expert commentary: We believe it is time for hospitalists to weigh in on this important issue by formally commenting on the new guidelines, establishing research priorities, and leading future research studies in the field to help achieve consensus among all clinicians in the appropriate management of sepsis.

publication date

  • November 14, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Critical Care
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Sepsis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85057090852

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1080/14787210.2018.1547192

PubMed ID

  • 30412683

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 16

issue

  • 12