Utilization of integrative medicine differs by age among pediatric oncology patients. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: Coping with symptoms related to cancer treatment is challenging for pediatric patients with cancer and their caregivers. Additionally, caring for pediatric patients requires specialized expertise to incorporate age-appropriate interventions to improve outcomes. Despite the increase in pediatric inpatient integrative medicine (IM) therapies, there is a paucity of knowledge about whether the utilization of IM therapies differs by patient age. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on IM utilization among pediatric inpatients between 2008 and 2016 in a tertiary urban cancer center using electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the relationship between age and specific type of IM utilization, adjusting for specific demographic factors. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2016, the pediatric inpatient IM service had 20 686 visits and treated 1877 unique patients. A significant age difference (P < 0.001) by modality was noted: dance therapy (mean age ± standard deviation: 5.9 ± 5.3 years), music therapy (8.0±7.0 years), mind-body therapies (13.0 ± 7.7 years), massage (14.5 ± 7.8 years), and acupuncture (20.0 ± 7.9 years). In multivariable analysis, the association between age and use of specific IM therapies remained significant (P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Specific types of inpatient IM therapy usage significantly differed by the age of pediatric patients with cancer; therefore, designing and providing age-appropriate IM interventions with consideration for developmental stage are needed to ensure that the most appropriate and effective therapies are provided to children with cancer.

publication date

  • January 31, 2019

Research

keywords

  • Acupuncture Therapy
  • Dance Therapy
  • Integrative Medicine
  • Massage
  • Mind-Body Therapies
  • Music Therapy
  • Neoplasms

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC6866674

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85060957765

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/pbc.27639

PubMed ID

  • 30706689

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 66

issue

  • 6