A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: In two interim analyses of this trial, patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device were less likely to have pump thrombosis or nondisabling stroke than were patients treated with a mechanical-bearing axial-flow left ventricular assist device. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the centrifugal-flow pump or the axial-flow pump irrespective of the intended goal of use (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The principal secondary end point was pump replacement at 2 years. RESULTS: This final analysis included 1028 enrolled patients: 516 in the centrifugal-flow pump group and 512 in the axial-flow pump group. In the analysis of the primary end point, 397 patients (76.9%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 332 (64.8%) in the axial-flow pump group, remained alive and free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 for superiority). Pump replacement was less common in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (12 patients [2.3%] vs. 57 patients [11.3%]; relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.38; P<0.001). The numbers of events per patient-year for stroke of any severity, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device was associated with less frequent need for pump replacement than an axial-flow device and was superior with respect to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755.).

authors

  • Mehra, Mandeep R
  • Uriel, Nir
  • Naka, Yoshifumi
  • Cleveland, Joseph C
  • Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
  • Salerno, Christopher T
  • Walsh, Mary N
  • Milano, Carmelo A
  • Patel, Chetan B
  • Hutchins, Steven W
  • Ransom, John
  • Ewald, Gregory A
  • Itoh, Akinobu
  • Raval, Nirav Y
  • Silvestry, Scott C
  • Cogswell, Rebecca
  • John, Ranjit
  • Bhimaraj, Arvind
  • Bruckner, Brian A
  • Lowes, Brian D
  • Um, John Y
  • Jeevanandam, Valluvan
  • Sayer, Gabriel
  • Mangi, Abeel A
  • Molina, Ezequiel J
  • Sheikh, Farooq
  • Aaronson, Keith
  • Pagani, Francis D
  • Cotts, William G
  • Tatooles, Antone J
  • Babu, Ashok
  • Chomsky, Don
  • Katz, Jason N
  • Tessmann, Paul B
  • Dean, David
  • Krishnamoorthy, Arun
  • Chuang, Joyce
  • Topuria, Ia
  • Sood, Poornima
  • Goldstein, Daniel J

publication date

  • March 17, 2019

Research

keywords

  • Heart Failure
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Prosthesis Design

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85063625597

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486

PubMed ID

  • 30883052

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 380

issue

  • 17