Bone-Plug Versus Soft Tissue Fixation of Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplants: A Biomechanical Study.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether soft tissue fixation only and bone-plug techniques for medial meniscal allograft transplantation provide equivalent fixation and restoration of load distribution. Prior studies on this topic did not re-create the clinical situation with use of size-, side-, and compartment-matched meniscal transplants. HYPOTHESIS: Both techniques will provide equivalent fixation of the meniscal transplant and restore load distribution and contact pressures similar to those of the native knee. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees underwent mean contact pressure, mean contact area, and peak contact pressure evaluation in 4 medial meniscal testing conditions (native, total meniscectomy, bone-plug fixation, and soft tissue fixation) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°) using Tekscan sensors under a 700-N axial load. RESULTS: Medial meniscectomy resulted in significantly decreased contact area and increased contact pressure compared with the native condition at all flexion angles (P < .0001). Compared with the native state, soft tissue fixation demonstrated significantly higher mean contact pressure and lower mean contact area at 0° and 30° of flexion (P < .05), while bone-plug fixation showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference in peak contact pressure between study conditions. CONCLUSION: Total medial meniscectomy leads to significantly worsened load distribution within the knee. Medial meniscal allograft transplantation can restore load parameters close to those of the native condition. The bone-plug technique demonstrated improved tibiofemoral contact pressures compared with soft tissue fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Medial meniscal allograft transplantation with bone-plug fixation is a viable option to restore biomechanics in patients with meniscal deficiency.
