Deep learning risk assessment models for predicting progression of radiographic medial joint space loss over a 48-MONTH follow-up period. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate deep learning (DL) risk assessment models for predicting the progression of radiographic medial joint space loss using baseline knee X-rays. METHODS: Knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative without and with progression of radiographic joint space loss (defined as ≥ 0.7 mm decrease in medial joint space width measurement between baseline and 48-month follow-up X-rays) were randomly stratified into training (1400 knees) and hold-out testing (400 knees) datasets. A DL network was trained to predict the progression of radiographic joint space loss using the baseline knee X-rays. An artificial neural network was used to develop a traditional model for predicting progression utilizing demographic and radiographic risk factors. A combined joint training model was developed using a DL network to extract information from baseline knee X-rays as a feature vector, which was further concatenated with the risk factor data vector. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed using the hold-out test dataset to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: The traditional model had an AUC of 0.660 (61.5% sensitivity and 64.0% specificity) for predicting progression. The DL model had an AUC of 0.799 (78.0% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity), which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the traditional model. The combined model had an AUC of 0.863 (80.5% sensitivity and specificity), which was significantly higher than the DL (P = 0.015) and traditional (P < 0.001) models. CONCLUSION: DL models using baseline knee X-rays had higher diagnostic performance for predicting the progression of radiographic joint space loss than the traditional model using demographic and radiographic risk factors.

publication date

  • February 6, 2020

Research

keywords

  • Deep Learning
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC7137777

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85080063700

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.010

PubMed ID

  • 32035934

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 28

issue

  • 4