Using qualitative approaches to improve quantitative inferences in environmental psychology. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • This article describes the qualitative approach used to generate and interpret the quantitative study reported by Song and colleagues' (2020) in their article, "What counts as an 'environmental' issue? Differences in environmental issue conceptualization across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status." Song and colleagues (2020) describe the results of a survey documenting that, in the United States, White and high-SES respondents perceive environmental issues differently than their non-White and lower-SES counterparts, reflecting structural differences in environmental risks. While Song and colleagues (2020) discuss the survey results in detail, the discussion of the qualitative research that led to the creation of that survey was limited due to space constraints. The current article provides a more holistic account of the methods behind the Song and colleagues (2020) study by discussing the qualitative component of the research in detail. In addition to discussing how the qualitative research complements and critically informs the findings reported by Song et al., we also consider the broader implications and value of integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in environmental psychology.•Conduct qualitative study to inform quantitative design.•Use qualitative patterns to make inferences about quantitative indicators.

authors

  • Lewis, Neil
  • Bravo, Mario
  • Naiman, Sarah
  • Pearson, Adam R
  • Romero-Canyas, Rainer
  • Schuldt, Jonathon P
  • Song, Hwanseok

publication date

  • May 28, 2020

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC7289758

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85086118364

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100943

PubMed ID

  • 32551245

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 7