Getting Along in Assisted Living: Quality of Relationships Between Family Members and Staff. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Assisted living facilities (ALFs) have quickly expanded as an alternative to nursing homes. Research on nursing homes has revealed problems in relationships between family members and staff. However, little is known about these relationships within ALFs. The purpose of the current study was to examine the prevalence of conflict and positive and negative interactions from the perspective of both family members and staff and to examine the effects of positive and negative aspects of the relationship on salient staff and family outcomes in ALFs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected from 252 family members and 472 staff members across 20 ALFs who participated in the Partners in Care in Assisted Living study. Participants completed measures including interpersonal conflict, depressive symptoms, perception of treatment, and stress related to caregiving. RESULTS: Conflict among family and staff members was found to be relatively low. For staff, interpersonal conflict and treatment by family members significantly predicted burnout and depressive symptoms. For families, only female gender significantly predicted burden. Subgroup analyses, however, indicated that the effect of interpersonal conflict was significantly associated with perceived caregiver burden among family members whose relative had dementia. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite the relatively harmonious relationships among family-staff in ALFs, sources of conflict and negative interactions were identified, revealing the importance of collaborative relationships and the influence these relationships have on both family and staff outcomes. These findings can inform intervention efforts to improve family-staff interactions within ALFs.

publication date

  • November 23, 2020

Research

keywords

  • Assisted Living Facilities
  • Nursing Homes

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC7681211

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85096815592

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1093/geront/gnaa057

PubMed ID

  • 32614048

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 60

issue

  • 8