Faculty perceptions of student plagiarism and interventions to tackle it: a multiphase mixed-methods study in Qatar. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The widespread use of the internet and other digital resources has contributed to the escalation of plagiarism among medical students and students of other healthcare professions. Concerns were raised by faculty at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q), a branch of Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University in New York, who had been observing plagiarism in students' assignments. METHODS: To identify the extent of plagiarism practices and their contributing factors, a two-phase mixed-method research study was conducted, comprising a survey administered in 2013, followed by longitudinal interventions, and a second survey in 2017 to measure the impact of the interventions. RESULTS: By Phase II, overall observed plagiarism incidents per year decreased from 44 to 28%, and the number of faculty who observed no plagiarism incidents increased significantly from 12 to 37%. The faculty concerned about student plagiarism decreased by 33% [53.1 to 20%] between Phase I and Phase II. CONCLUSION: When students are provided with information regarding what constitutes plagiarism and their institution's policy in response to plagiarism incidents, they are less likely to engage in such practices.

publication date

  • September 21, 2020

Research

keywords

  • Faculty
  • Plagiarism

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC7504824

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85091470408

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1186/s12909-020-02205-2

PubMed ID

  • 32958003

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 20

issue

  • 1