Assessing the cognitive and behavioral development of 3-year-old children born from fathers with severe male infertility.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the large number of babies born worldwide following intracytoplasmic sperm injection, concerns about the procedure's safety still exist owing to the use of suboptimal spermatozoa. Thus, follow-up of children conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection is highly recommended. We propose the use of parent-administered questionnaires to monitor the development of offspring conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether male infertility treatment affects offspring development. STUDY DESIGN: We compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes and physical and psychological development of toddlers conceived via in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Once newborns reached 3 years of age, participating patients were sent a set of parent-administered questionnaires, including the Ages and Stages Questionnaires; Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire 2; Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition; Social Skills Rating System; Parenting Stress Index, Third Edition; and Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 2-3. Child development was measured by the Ages and Stages Questionnaires; Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire 2; and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition, questionnaires, whereas Social Skills Rating System; Parenting Stress Index, Third Edition; and Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 2-3 questionnaires were used to measure child behavior. The child's developmental or behavioral outcome was considered "abnormal" when he or she scored below average in ≥2 questionnaires from the respective category. We also conducted subanalyses to assess the effects of male genomic integrity, DNA fragmentation, chemical exposure, utilization of surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and extended embryo culture to determine the development of a child conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection. RESULTS: A total of 12,306 couples met the inclusion criteria for this study; 1914 of 7433 patients (25.8%) who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection and 451 of 4873 patients (9.3%) who underwent in vitro fertilization returned the questionnaires. Our comparison of obstetrical outcomes between the 2 groups did not reveal any significant differences in the mode of delivery distribution, with most mothers having uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Furthermore, gender distribution, gestational ages, and birthweights were also comparable between children conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. However, children conceived via in vitro fertilization displayed impaired developmental characteristics compared with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived cohort (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9; P=.0004). There was no difference in child behavior. Furthermore, 3 cases of autism were reported, 1 case from the in vitro fertilization group and 2 from the intracytoplasmic sperm injection group, all conceived from couples with an older male partner. Ages and Stages Questionnaires outcomes were also compared for the offspring conceived via in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection by gender; however, no significant differences were observed. In addition, 5 separate subanalyses were then conducted exclusively for the intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived group. Levels of spermatogenic failure, DNA fragmentation, and chemical exposure did not significantly affect offspring development. Interestingly, although the length of embryo culture did not seem to influence child development, the abnormal behavior rate was significantly higher in children from the day 3 embryo transfer cohort (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.34; P=.04). Children conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection from ejaculated spermatozoa displayed impaired developmental and behavioral characteristics compared with toddlers conceived from surgically retrieved specimens (adjusted odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-20.7; P=.05). CONCLUSION: Most children conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization are developing well without significant delays. Although the development of a child conceived via intracytoplasmic sperm injection was not affected by most of the variables assessed, those conceived from surgically retrieved spermatozoa were at a considerably lower risk of abnormal developmental and abnormal behavioral characteristics than offspring conceived from ejaculated specimens. However, given the small numbers of respondents available for many subgroups of interest, further studies of outcomes of children born from fathers with severe male factor infertility are warranted.
