Understanding the Use of the Newcastle, PEDIG, and LACTOSE Control Scores Among Pediatric Ophthalmologists for Intermittent Exotropia. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: To determine the clinical use patterns of control scores for intermittent exotropia. The Newcastle Control Score, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) score, and Look And Cover, then Ten seconds of Observation Scale for Exotropia (LACTOSE) Control Score were developed to quantify control of exodeviations. METHODS: A short survey was posted on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus forum in August and September 2021. Respondents were asked about their assessment of control in intermittent exotropia, including knowledge and use of the various control scales. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen pediatric ophthalmologists responded; 54.4% (n = 62) reported not using any specific control score for intermittent exotropia, although 61.4% (n = 70) were familiar with the PEDIG score, 37.7% (n = 43) with the Newcastle Control Score, and 7.9% (n = 9) with the LACTOSE Control Score. The PEDIG score was the most widely used (26.3%, n = 30), but 36.7% (n = 11) of respondents reported that the scale is too time-intensive, limiting its use. To improve the use of the control scores, participants recommended promoting wider understanding of the scales (45.6%, n = 52). CONCLUSIONS: Most responding pediatric ophthalmologists do not use a specific control score in managing intermittent exotropia. The PEDIG score is the most frequently used but is reported as time-intensive. Although the LACTOSE Control Score was designed to provide a quicker alternative, it is not widely known. Promoting wider awareness and understanding of intermittent exotropia control scores may be helpful to allow for more objective quantification of control in intermittent exotropia. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(2):131-138.].

publication date

  • May 25, 2022

Research

keywords

  • Exotropia
  • Ophthalmologists
  • Strabismus

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85149472029

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3928/01913913-20220425-02

PubMed ID

  • 35611821

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 60

issue

  • 2