Periprocedural imaging compared to endometrial biopsy: is biopsy required prior to uterine artery embolisation?
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
AIM: To compare the detection rate of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound relative to endometrial biopsy for endometrial abnormalities in both pre- and post-menopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was an institutional review board-approved, single-institution retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pelvic MRI within 1 year of diagnostic-quality biopsies from 2008-2018 (n=668). There were 303 patients who received uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and 478 patients who received pelvic ultrasound within the study period. Medical records were evaluated for radiological-histopathological correlation, demographics, laboratory studies, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: In this cohort of 668 patients, there were 37 biopsies positive for malignancy; women with malignancy were older (58 versus 47 years, p<0.0001) and more likely to be post-menopausal (66% versus 12%, p<0.0001). There were 303 patients who underwent UAE and underwent a diagnostic-quality endometrial biopsy during the pre-procedural evaluation, none of whom were post-menopausal and had a mean age of 45 years. In women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) or post-menopausal bleeding (PMB), the sensitivity of MRI for detecting endometrial cancer was 96.2%, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8%, compared to 68% and 97% for ultrasound, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of pre-biopsy MRI in identifying pre-malignant and malignant endometrial pathology demonstrated an AUC of 0.8920 (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In women with AUB or PMB, MRI has a 99.8% NPV in ruling out endometrial cancer. Further consideration should be made towards optimising pre-procedural evaluation for UAE.
