Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Study Detailed Bone Apposition and Fixation of Cementless Knee System Compared to Cemented Total Knee Replacements. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The ability to utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess bony fixation may allow a better understanding of implant design and longevity. A new cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced, and we hypothesized that this cementless system would show similar fixation compared to a cemented system as assessed by multispectral MRI. METHODS: Multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective MRI was performed in 20 patients implanted with a cementless TKA. A matched control group of 20 patients who had a cemented TKA was also evaluated. Each patellar, femoral, and tibial component was graded globally as well as by specific zones. The patella zones were medial, lateral, superior, and inferior. The femoral and tibial components were divided into 4 zones: anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral. Integration grades were performed for each zone as follows: (1) normal, (2) fibrous tissue, (3) fluid interface, (4) osteolysis. A Chi-square test was performed to detect differences in level of integration grades between patients with cemented and those with cementless TKA. RESULTS: At average 16-month follow-up, the cementless group grading noted 0/80 (0%) vs 2/76 (2.63%) patellar zones with fluid interface, 0/80 (0%) vs 26/80 (32.5%) femoral zones with fibrous tissue, and 10/80 (12.5%) vs 17/80 (21.25%) tibial zones with fibrous tissue. The analysis showed patellar (P < .001), femoral (P < .001), and tibial (P < .001) components had improved fixation and less percentage of fibrous tissue and fluid present in the cementless TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing metal suppression MRI, a newer cementless knee implant demonstrated excellent biologic fixation and improved fixation compared to the cemented group.

publication date

  • August 30, 2022

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC9445226

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85138550133

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.013

PubMed ID

  • 36082282

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 17