Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Versus Other Treatments of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder that is increasing in prevalence, both in the United States and worldwide. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the gold-standard treatment for OSA, is cost-effective from both a payer and societal perspective. Alternative treatments of OSA, including oral appliance therapy, various surgeries, and hypoglossal nerve stimulation have also been evaluated from a cost-effectiveness perspective although results are less consistent. Some studies directly compare these alternative therapies with CPAP. This review will discuss the available literature for cost-effectiveness analysis in the treatment of OSA.

publication date

  • October 9, 2022

Research

keywords

  • Mandibular Advancement
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85139737777

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jsmc.2022.07.003

PubMed ID

  • 36333075

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 17

issue

  • 4