How Do Orthopedic Surgeons Stay Up-to-Date With the Literature? A Survey.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
Background: With the rise of social media and other web-based platforms, there has been a shift in how medical research findings are disseminated. Questions/Purposes: We sought to investigate how often orthopedic surgeons use different knowledge-seeking methods and how confident they were in their ability to stay up-to-date. Methods: We distributed a 23-question survey to 120 orthopedic surgeons employed at a single tertiary-care metropolitan orthopedic hospital. The survey collected the surgeons' use of reference managers, RSS feeds, and preferred methods of staying up-to-date. Respondents were asked to report the number of hours they spent staying up-to-date per week and their success with keeping up with orthopedic specialty literature. Results: A total of 85 physicians responded (median age, 52 years); 83% of respondents who spent 3 or more hours a week in keeping up-to-date with the literature said they felt successful in doing so, while 40% of participants who spent less than 1 hour a week said they felt successful. Fifty-five percent of surgeons under the median age used social media, while only 29% of surgeons over the median age used social media. Conclusions: This survey suggests that spending only 1 to 2 hours per week was enough to make the orthopedic surgeons we surveyed feel confident that they were keeping up with the literature in their specialty. These findings also suggest that it may be more important for surgeons to choose a convenient method of literature review that will enable them to maximize time spent reading, rather than attempting to use any one source.
