Is Multifocality a Predictor of Poor Outcome in Childhood and Adolescent Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma? Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • CONTEXT: Total thyroidectomy in pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is recommended in national guidelines because of the high incidence of multifocal disease (MFD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of MFD in childhood and adolescent vs adult PTC and whether MFD is a predictor for poorer outcomes in childhood and adolescent PTC. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved review of patients with PTC undergoing surgery (1986-2021) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Clinical and pathological characteristics in patients with unifocal disease (UFD) and MFD were compared using Pearson's χ2 test. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis assessed the impact of MFD on outcome. RESULTS: MFD was less common in childhood and adolescent patients with PTC (45%; 127/283) than in adults (54%; 3023/5564; P = .002). Childhood and adolescent patients with UFD and MFD had similar tumor stage and PTC subtype at presentation, with no significant difference in histopathologic features. Median follow-up was 68 months. There was no significant difference in 5-year recurrence-free probability and overall survival was 100% in both groups. There was no significant difference in 5-year contralateral lobe PTC-free probability between patients with UFD and MFD treated with lobectomy. Multivariate analysis showed MFD was not a predictor for recurrence. CONCLUSION: MFD was less common in childhood and adolescent patients with PTC than adults and was not a predictor of poor outcome on multivariate analysis, with excellent long-term outcomes in all patients with PTC. MFD does not appear to warrant completion thyroidectomy in childhood and adolescent patients selected for lobectomy.

publication date

  • November 17, 2023

Research

keywords

  • Thyroid Neoplasms

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC10655537

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85177103369

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1210/clinem/dgad369

PubMed ID

  • 37350510

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 108

issue

  • 12