Are we on track for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma with a minimum quantity of five malignant cells in lower tract specimens? Critical analysis of The Paris System Quantitation Criteria. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) has gained universal acceptance as the standard for reporting urine cytology requiring at least 5-10 malignant cells to diagnose high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in lower and upper urinary tract specimens, respectively. These quantitation criteria are still subject to discussion, and this study specifically aims to validate the quantitation criterion of HGUC in lower urinary tract. DESIGN: The authors reviewed two cohorts of lower urinary tract cases. The first cohort consisted of 100 liquid-based ThinPrep slides with the diagnosis of HGUC having positive histology on concurrent or follow-up biopsies within 3 months. The second cohort was 36 HGUC cases with negative histology on concurrent biopsies and within 3 months. The number of high-grade cells (HGCs) meeting the TPS qualitative criteria were counted under the light microscope driven in a grid-like manner. RESULTS: The first 100 urine samples showed five cases (5.0%) with three HGCs, three cases (3.0%) had four HGCs, five cases (5.0%) showed five HGCs, and 25 cases (25.0%) had between 6-10 HGCs. The risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) in cases with five or more HGCs was 100%, whereas those with three HGCs was 60.0%. The second cohort of HGUC was considered "positive" despite a negative histology. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that quantitation is an essential key to diagnose HGUC. The current TPS criterion of a minimum of five malignant cells in lower tract is robust with a ROHM of 100%. Diagnosing HGUC with less than five HGCs runs the risk of lowering the ROHM.

publication date

  • August 12, 2023

Research

keywords

  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
  • Urinary Tract
  • Urologic Neoplasms

Identity

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/cncy.22749

PubMed ID

  • 37572083